Speaker summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video41.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Kaiser results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Self-Serving Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 58.3% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 76 faulty-reasoning hits from 41.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (11,930 of 28,200 speakers). This Daniel Kaiser is worse (more manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group.
Daniel Kaiser
Speaker details
Total words: 41.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510057.7% percentile
39.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos41.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 58.3%58.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 58.3%58.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 20.8%20.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 58.3%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 58.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos