Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video69 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Danica Rodarmel results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Begging the Question, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 230 faulty-reasoning hits from 69 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 70% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,840 of 28,364 speakers). This Danica Rodarmel is worse (more manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group.
Danica Rodarmel
Speaker details
Total words: 69
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510079.4% percentile
70.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos69 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos