Speaker summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video41.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dane Matthews results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Actor-Observer Bias, with Actor-Observer Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 31 faulty-reasoning hits from 41.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (8,652 of 28,364 speakers). This Dane Matthews is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
Dane Matthews
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠70%Dane Matthews (selected)50%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 41.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510069.5% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos41.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.6%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos