Speaker summary
58%1 analyzed article/video77.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Danagoulian results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 160.363 faulty-reasoning hits from 77.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20% and a BS Rank of 32% (19,300 of 28,364 speakers). This Danagoulian is better (less manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group.
Danagoulian
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 77.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510032.0% percentile
20.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos77.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 21.2%21.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 26.6%26.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 21.4%21.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 21.2%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos