Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dana Williamson results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Quote-first Misdirection, and Unattributed Quote, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 116 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (8,650 of 28,364 speakers). This Dana Williamson is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
Dana Williamson
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510069.5% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ad Hominem: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos