Speaker summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video222.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dana Felton results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 27.5% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 298 faulty-reasoning hits from 222.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (23,417 of 28,364 speakers). This Dana Felton is better (less manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group.
Dana Felton
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 222.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510017.4% percentile
12.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos222.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 27.5%27.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 27.5%27.5%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 5.4%5.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos