Speaker summary
ā 53%1 analyzed article/video84 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dana Cole results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Confirmation Bias, and Burden of Proof, with Special Pleading as the most egregious example at 50.8% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 159 faulty-reasoning hits from 84 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.9% and a BS Rank of ā 57% (12,379 of 28,364 speakers). This Dana Cole is worse (more manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
Dana Cole
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 57%Dana Cole (selected)38%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 84
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510056.4% percentile
37.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos84 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“75%
0.0%20%40%60%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 50.8%50.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 50.8%50.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 24.6%24.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 25.4%25.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Special Pleading: Speaker 50.8%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 50.8%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 7.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 0.4%Special PleadingSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos