Speaker summary
66%2 analyzed articles/videos167.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Shapiro results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 32.3% saturation with 59.637 hits. Analysis detected 422.082 faulty-reasoning hits from 167.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 17.7% and a BS Rank of 28% (20,481 of 28,364 speakers). This Dan Shapiro is better (less manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
Dan Shapiro
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 167.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

28% percentile
025507510027.8% percentile
17.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos167.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 32.3%32.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 18.1%18.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 16.5%16.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 18.1%18.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ad Hominem: Speaker 32.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos