Speaker summary
47% 1 analyzed article/video 370.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Moye results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Status Quo Bias , and Begging the Question , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 142 hits . Analysis detected 1,068.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 370.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.7% and a BS Rank of 11% (24,818 of 27,801 speakers). This Dan Moye is better (less manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group. Dan Moye
Speaker details
Total words: 370.667
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.7% percentile 9.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos370.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 25.5% 25.5% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 17.1% 17.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 13.3% 13.3% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 21.0% 21.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Optimism Bias: Speaker 25.5%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Loss Aversion: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 2.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.4% Bandwagon: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst