Speaker summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video168.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Mallinson results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Appeal to Authority, and Recency Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 168 faulty-reasoning hits from 168.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (23,151 of 28,364 speakers). This Dan Mallinson is better (less manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group.
Dan Mallinson
Speaker details
Total words: 168.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

18% percentile
025507510018.4% percentile
13.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos168.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 14.1%14.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 12.6%12.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 2.7%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos