Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video46.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Koh results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Red Herring, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 39.375 hits. Analysis detected 323.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 46.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 61.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,919 of 28,364 speakers). This Dan Koh is worse (more manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Dan Koh
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 46.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510075.6% percentile
61.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos46.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Red Herring: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%Red HerringSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos