Speaker summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video158 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Bedford results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Overconfidence Bias, and Framing Effect, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 33.6% saturation with 60.355 hits. Analysis detected 304.236 faulty-reasoning hits from 158 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (22,958 of 28,364 speakers). This Dan Bedford is better (less manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group.
Dan Bedford
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 158
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510019.1% percentile
13.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos158 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 33.6%33.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 23.4%23.4%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.6%10.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%False Dilemma: Speaker 33.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 4.6%Middle Ground: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 0.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 1.1%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos