Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video188.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Alamariu results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 27.9% saturation with 77 hits. Analysis detected 412.062 faulty-reasoning hits from 188.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (20,686 of 28,364 speakers). This Dan Alamariu is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Dan Alamariu
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠28%Dan Alamariu (selected)18%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 188.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510027.1% percentile
17.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos188.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 27.9%27.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 39.7%39.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 39.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos