Speaker summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video90.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dallas Koelling results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 60.3% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 327 faulty-reasoning hits from 90.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,500 of 28,364 speakers). This Dallas Koelling is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Dallas Koelling
Speaker details
Total words: 90.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.4% percentile
33.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos90.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 60.3%60.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 60.3%60.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 30.1%30.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 30.1%30.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 19.9%19.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 30.1%30.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 60.3%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 60.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 30.1%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 30.1%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 30.1%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 8.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos