Speaker summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video402 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cynthia Feliciano results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 81.061 hits. Analysis detected 687.423 faulty-reasoning hits from 402 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (27,077 of 28,364 speakers). This Cynthia Feliciano is better (less manipulative) than 95.50% of the peer group.
Cynthia Feliciano
Speaker details
Total words: 402
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

5% percentile
02550751004.5% percentile
6.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos402 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.6%8.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.5%Horn Effect: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 1.0%Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos