Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cynical Publius results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 30.375 hits. Analysis detected 192.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 60.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,951 of 28,364 speakers). This Cynical Publius is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Cynical Publius
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510075.5% percentile
60.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos36 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos