Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video124 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Curtis Osceola results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Hasty Generalization, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 54.8% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 178.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 124 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (15,298 of 28,364 speakers). This Curtis Osceola is better (less manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group.
Curtis Osceola
Speaker details
Total words: 124
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510046.1% percentile
28.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos124 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 45.2%45.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 54.8%54.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 12.1%12.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 54.8%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 45.2%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 8.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos