Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video49 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cuba’s government results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias and Self-Serving Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 71 hits. Analysis detected 142 faulty-reasoning hits from 49 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (5,843 of 26,611 speakers). This Cuba’s government is worse (more manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group.
Cuba’s government
Speaker details
Total words: 49
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510078.0% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos49 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 62.0%62.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 38.0%38.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 62.0%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 38.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos