Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video98.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crush MAGA PAC results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 76.5% saturation with 117 hits. Analysis detected 470 faulty-reasoning hits from 98.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,016 of 27,081 speakers). This Crush MAGA PAC is better (less manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group.
Crush MAGA PAC
Speaker details
Total words: 98.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510048.2% percentile
30.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos98.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 76.5%76.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 59.5%59.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 28.8%28.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 30.7%30.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 28.8%28.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 28.8%28.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 18.9%18.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 76.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 59.5%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 30.7%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 6.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 26.9%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos