Speaker summary
⁠76%2 analyzed articles/videos101.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crosby Doyle results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, False Dilemma, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 441.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 101.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 64.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,485 of 28,364 speakers). This Crosby Doyle is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Crosby Doyle
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.1% percentile
64.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos101.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 37.5%37.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 25.0%25.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos