Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video75.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Craig Underwood results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Nature, Special Pleading, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 38.6% saturation with 29.124 hits. Analysis detected 164.884 faulty-reasoning hits from 75.5 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 31.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,484 of 28,364 speakers). This Craig Underwood is better (less manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Craig Underwood
Speaker details
Total words: 75.5
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510048.9% percentile
31.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos75.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 61.8%61.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 61.8%61.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 38.6%38.6%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 18.2%18.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 15.4%15.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 15.4%15.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 61.8%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 61.8%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 38.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 0.2%Special Pleading: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 0.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos