Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video61 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Craig Fehrman results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 85.2% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 200 faulty-reasoning hits from 61 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 54.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,712 of 28,364 speakers). This Craig Fehrman is worse (more manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
Craig Fehrman
Speaker details
Total words: 61
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.8% percentile
54.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos61 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 85.3%85.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 85.3%85.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 57.4%57.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 42.6%42.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 42.6%42.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 14.8%14.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 85.3%, sitewide 9.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 85.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 57.4%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 42.6%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 42.6%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos