Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video93 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cornerstone University results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, False Dilemma, and Status Quo Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.2% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 191 faulty-reasoning hits from 93 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (17,892 of 28,364 speakers). This Cornerstone University is better (less manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Cornerstone University
Speaker details
Total words: 93
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510036.9% percentile
22.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos93 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 31.2%31.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 31.2%31.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 31.2%31.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 31.2%31.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 16.1%16.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 31.2%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 31.2%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 31.2%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 31.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos