Speaker summary
44% 1 analyzed article/video 508.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cornelius Hocker results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 141 hits . Analysis detected 585.546 faulty-reasoning hits from 508.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of 4% (25,094 of 26,105 speakers). This Cornelius Hocker is better (less manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group. Cornelius Hocker
Speaker details
Total words: 508.333
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.9% percentile 6.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos508.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 18.7% 18.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 14.6% 14.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst