Speaker summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video86.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coreen Dent results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 235 faulty-reasoning hits from 86.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,484 of 28,364 speakers). This Coreen Dent is better (less manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Coreen Dent
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 86.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510034.8% percentile
21.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos86.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 27.2%27.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 27.2%27.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 27.2%27.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 14.0%14.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 27.2%27.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 27.2%27.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 19.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos