Speaker summary
42%2 analyzed articles/videos174.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Loss Aversion, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 35.5% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 252 faulty-reasoning hits from 174.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.1% and a BS Rank of 23% (21,998 of 28,364 speakers). This Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is better (less manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC)
Speaker details
Total words: 174.5
Article count: 2
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510022.4% percentile
15.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos174.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 35.5%35.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 11.1%11.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Indoctrination: Speaker 35.5%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 4.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate