Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video59 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Food Advocates results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 59 hits. Analysis detected 118 faulty-reasoning hits from 59 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (922 of 28,364 speakers). This Community Food Advocates is worse (more manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group.
Community Food Advocates
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠97%Community Food Advocates (selected)100%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 59
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

97% percentile
025507510096.8% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos59 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos