Speaker summary
⁠36%4 analyzed articles/videos210 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Committee to Protect Journalists results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Burden of Proof, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 29.6% saturation with 72.891 hits. Analysis detected 296.891 faulty-reasoning hits from 210 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (22,301 of 28,364 speakers). This Committee to Protect Journalists is better (less manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group.
Committee to Protect Journalists
Speaker details
Total words: 210
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

21% percentile
025507510021.4% percentile
14.5% BS Score4 analyzed videos210 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 17.5%17.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 11.3%11.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 0.4%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos