Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These combatant command results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 42.1% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 126 faulty-reasoning hits from 76 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (17,540 of 28,364 speakers). This combatant command is better (less manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
combatant command
Speaker details
Total words: 76
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

38% percentile
025507510038.2% percentile
23.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos76 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 42.1%42.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 19.7%19.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 19.7%19.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 21.1%21.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 42.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos