Speaker summary
⁠56%4 analyzed articles/videos47.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cockroach Janta Party results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Representativeness Heuristic, and Bandwagon, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 44.3% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 165 faulty-reasoning hits from 47.5 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 30.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,816 of 28,364 speakers). This Cockroach Janta Party is better (less manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Cockroach Janta Party
Speaker details
Total words: 47.5
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510047.8% percentile
30.1% BS Score4 analyzed videos47.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 44.3%44.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 44.3%44.3%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 40.0%40.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 44.3%44.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 20.0%20.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 44.3%, sitewide 5.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 44.3%, sitewide 26.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 44.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 0.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos