Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video117 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clint Christopher results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Composition/Division, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 36.5% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 193.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 117 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (17,594 of 26,155 speakers). This Clint Christopher is better (less manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group.
Clint Christopher
Speaker details
Total words: 117
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510032.7% percentile
20.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos117 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 36.5%36.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 26.9%26.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.4%30.4%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 13.5%13.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Indoctrination: Speaker 36.5%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.4%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Composition/Division: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 0.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos