Speaker summary
⁠80%2 analyzed articles/videos42.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clement Delangue results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Actor-Observer Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 42.1% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 166.533 faulty-reasoning hits from 42.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 38.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,251 of 28,364 speakers). This Clement Delangue is worse (more manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Clement Delangue
Speaker details
Total words: 42.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510056.8% percentile
38.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos42.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 55.9%55.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 42.1%42.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 55.9%55.9%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 23.7%23.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 55.9%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 55.9%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 42.1%, sitewide 1.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 0.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos