Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video55 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clean Air Minnesota results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Self-Serving Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 55 hits. Analysis detected 300 faulty-reasoning hits from 55 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 77.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,006 of 26,891 speakers). This Clean Air Minnesota is worse (more manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Clean Air Minnesota
Speaker details
Total words: 55
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510081.4% percentile
77.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos55 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 72.7%72.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 72.7%72.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 72.7%72.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 27.3%27.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%False Dilemma: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 72.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 72.7%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 72.7%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 2.7%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos