Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video133.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clayton Seigle results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Burden of Proof, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 36.5% saturation with 52.925 hits. Analysis detected 345.953 faulty-reasoning hits from 133.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (19,311 of 28,364 speakers). This Clayton Seigle is better (less manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group.
Clayton Seigle
Speaker details
Total words: 133.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510031.9% percentile
19.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos133.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 36.5%36.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 31.7%31.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 17.1%17.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 36.5%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution ErrorSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos