Speaker summary
ā 98%1 analyzed article/video17 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clay Bennett results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 17 hits. Analysis detected 34 faulty-reasoning hits from 17 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ā 97% (867 of 28,364 speakers). This Clay Bennett is worse (more manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group.
Clay Bennett
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 97%Clay Bennett (selected)100%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 17
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

97% percentile
025507510096.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos17 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos