Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video47 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Citizen Budget Commission (CBC) results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Burden of Proof, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 282 faulty-reasoning hits from 47 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (828 of 28,364 speakers). This Citizen Budget Commission (CBC) is worse (more manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group.
Citizen Budget Commission (CBC)
Speaker details
Total words: 47
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

97% percentile
025507510097.1% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos47 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.4%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos