Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video40 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Citigroup economists results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Recency Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 160 faulty-reasoning hits from 40 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (827 of 28,364 speakers). This Citigroup economists is worse (more manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group.
Citigroup economists
Speaker details
Total words: 40
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

97% percentile
025507510097.1% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos40 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos