Speaker summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video300 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cindy Samuelson results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 589.925 faulty-reasoning hits from 300 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (26,810 of 28,364 speakers). This Cindy Samuelson is better (less manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group.
Cindy Samuelson
Speaker details
Total words: 300
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

6% percentile
02550751005.5% percentile
6.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos300 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 30.1%30.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 10.6%10.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 30.1%, sitewide 3.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 0.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 7.5%Straw Man: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 0.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.4%Anecdotal: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos