Speaker summary
⁠52%2 analyzed articles/videos92 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chyann Tull results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 205 faulty-reasoning hits from 92 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 34.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,257 of 28,364 speakers). This Chyann Tull is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Chyann Tull
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 92
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.3% percentile
34.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos92 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 49.3%49.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 24.6%24.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 24.6%24.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 24.6%24.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 49.3%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 6.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos