Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video74.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chuck Waldman results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 50.8% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 321.733 faulty-reasoning hits from 74.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 36.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (12,794 of 28,364 speakers). This Chuck Waldman is worse (more manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
Chuck Waldman
Speaker details
Total words: 74.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510054.9% percentile
36.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos74.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 56.6%56.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 50.9%50.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 48.5%48.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 42.4%42.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 43.6%43.6%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 19.5%19.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 56.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 50.9%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 48.5%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 43.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 42.4%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 0.8%Special Pleading: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 0.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 19.2%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos