Speaker summary
⁠68%2 analyzed articles/videos457 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chuck Todd results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Appeal to Emotion, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 200 hits. Analysis detected 1,181.182 faulty-reasoning hits from 457 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (26,815 of 28,364 speakers). This Chuck Todd is better (less manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group.
Chuck Todd
Speaker details
Total words: 457
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

6% percentile
02550751005.5% percentile
6.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos457 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 15.0%15.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 14.1%14.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 9.4%9.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.3%13.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 11.0%11.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 15.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 4.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos