Speaker summary
⁠39%3 analyzed articles/videos118.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chuck Lorre results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, False Dilemma, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 29.2% saturation with 71 hits. Analysis detected 192 faulty-reasoning hits from 118.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 24% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (17,395 of 28,364 speakers). This Chuck Lorre is better (less manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group.
Chuck Lorre
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 118.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510038.7% percentile
24.0% BS Score3 analyzed videos118.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 47.4%47.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 47.4%47.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.2%29.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%False Dilemma: Speaker 47.4%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 47.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.3%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos