Speaker summary
83% 1 analyzed article/video 185.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chuck Gray results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 37.1% saturation with 96 hits . Analysis detected 597.739 faulty-reasoning hits from 185.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (19,226 of 28,364 speakers). This Chuck Gray is better (less manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group. Chuck Gray
Speaker details
Total words: 185.5
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.2% percentile 20.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos185.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 44.9% 44.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 27.0% 27.0% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 25.5% 25.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 37.1% 37.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 23.2% 23.2% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 16.6% 16.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 18.1% 18.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 14.7% 14.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 13.0% 13.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 14.7% 14.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Ad Hominem: Speaker 44.9%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 19.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 26.9% Straw Man: Speaker 25.5%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.7%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 3.7% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst