Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video202.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christy Fischer results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 56.5% saturation with 114.375 hits. Analysis detected 468.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 202.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (17,049 of 26,731 speakers). This Christy Fischer is better (less manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group.
Christy Fischer
Speaker details
Total words: 202.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510036.2% percentile
22.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos202.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 56.5%56.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 41.1%41.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 27.0%27.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 11.5%11.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 15.6%15.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 56.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 41.1%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 5.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos