Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video21.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christy Carlson Romano results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 16 hits. Analysis detected 64 faulty-reasoning hits from 21.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,357 of 28,364 speakers). This Christy Carlson Romano is worse (more manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group.
Christy Carlson Romano
Speaker details
Total words: 21.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510081.1% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos21.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos