Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video71 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Vizcardo results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Recency Bias, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 85.7% saturation with 108 hits. Analysis detected 319.429 faulty-reasoning hits from 71 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 44.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,877 of 28,364 speakers). This Christopher Vizcardo is worse (more manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group.
Christopher Vizcardo
Speaker details
Total words: 71
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.7% percentile
44.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos71 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 85.7%85.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 61.9%61.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 30.9%30.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 19.1%19.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 85.7%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 61.9%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 3.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos