Speaker summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video83.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Peden results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 94 hits. Analysis detected 199 faulty-reasoning hits from 83.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (16,225 of 28,364 speakers). This Christopher Peden is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Christopher Peden
Speaker details
Total words: 83.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510042.8% percentile
26.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos83.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 17.6%17.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos