Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video259 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher O'Connor results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 24.3% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 204 faulty-reasoning hits from 259 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (24,335 of 28,364 speakers). This Christopher O'Connor is better (less manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group.
Christopher O'Connor
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠15%Christopher O'Connor (selected)12%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 259
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

14% percentile
025507510014.2% percentile
11.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos259 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 24.3%24.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 9.3%9.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%False Dilemma: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 4.0%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos