Speaker summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video86.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Kepner results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Negativity Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 61% saturation with 60.952 hits. Analysis detected 326.952 faulty-reasoning hits from 86.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (13,989 of 28,364 speakers). This Christopher Kepner is worse (more manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
Christopher Kepner
Speaker details
Total words: 86.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510050.7% percentile
32.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos86.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 61.0%61.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 46.7%46.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 46.7%46.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 38.3%38.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 36.4%36.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 16.4%16.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 20.7%20.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 61.0%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 46.7%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 46.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 38.3%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 36.4%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos