Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video84 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Emigholz results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Begging the Question, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 80.2% saturation with 101 hits. Analysis detected 323.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 84 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 52.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (7,958 of 28,364 speakers). This Christopher Emigholz is worse (more manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group.
Christopher Emigholz
Speaker details
Total words: 84
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510071.9% percentile
52.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos84 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 80.2%80.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 60.3%60.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 84.9%84.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 29.8%29.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 30.2%30.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 30.2%30.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Speaker 84.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 80.2%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 60.3%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 30.2%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 30.2%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos